Skip to content

News & Updates

Legislative updates, court decisions, and regulatory changes affecting California firearms law.

Recent Articles

Proposed

AB 879 (2025): Unsafe Handgun Act Amendments

Assembly bill proposing changes to the Unsafe Handgun Act and certified handgun roster. Passed Assembly 69-0 in May 2025, held in Senate Appropriations under submission.

Legislation
Who: Handgun buyers and dealers in CaliforniaReviewed Jul 23, 2026
Proposed

AB 824 (2025): Protective Orders and Firearms Surrender

Assembly bill addressing protective order firearms surrender requirements. Passed Assembly 78-0 in June 2025, held in Senate Appropriations under submission.

Legislation
Who: Individuals subject to protective orders and firearms ownersReviewed Jul 23, 2026
Proposed

SB 248 (2025): Firearms Information for New Owners

Senate bill requiring additional information for new firearms owners at point of sale. Passed Senate 28-11 in June 2025, held in Assembly Appropriations under submission.

Legislation
Who: First-time firearms purchasers and licensed dealersReviewed Jul 23, 2026

Post-Bruen Litigation Landscape: California's Firearms Laws Under Fire

A comprehensive analysis of all pending Second Amendment cases affecting California. The Bruen decision has triggered challenges to nearly every major component of the state's firearms regulatory framework. This article examines which provisions are most vulnerable and provides a timeline of expected rulings.

Analysis
Who: All firearms owners, dealers, and policymakers in CaliforniaReviewed Apr 13, 2026

DOJ DROS and Automated Firearms System Updates

The California DOJ Bureau of Firearms has implemented updates to the Dealer Record of Sale (DROS) system and the Automated Firearms System (AFS), including changes to processing times, fee structures, and data reporting requirements.

Regulatory Updates
Who: All firearms purchasers, dealers, and registered firearms owners in CaliforniaAction: Firearms purchasers should verify their personal information is current in DOJ systems. Dealers should review the latest DROS processing guidelines on the DOJ Bureau of Firearms website.Reviewed Mar 12, 2026

May v. Bonta and Carralero v. Bonta: SB 2 Sensitive Places Challenge

May v. Bonta and Carralero v. Bonta challenged SB 2's list of sensitive places where concealed carry is prohibited. The Ninth Circuit made 20 of 26 categories enforceable (mandate January 23, 2025). Six remain enjoined. On June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Wolford v. Lopez, striking Hawaii's identical private-property default and cementing the injunction against SB 2's version. District proceedings continue.

Court Decisions
Who: All CCW permit holders and applicants in CaliforniaReviewed Jul 23, 2026

Boland v. Bonta: Handgun Roster and Microstamping Challenge

Boland v. Bonta challenges the California Handgun Roster and its microstamping requirement as unconstitutional under Bruen. The roster has shrunk from over 1,200 models at its peak to approximately 800 due to the microstamping mandate, which no manufacturer has been able to implement.

Court Decisions
Who: All California residents who wish to purchase new-model handgunsReviewed Jul 23, 2026

Miller v. Bonta: Assault Weapons Ban Challenge

Miller v. Bonta is the lead challenge to California's assault weapons ban. On June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, consolidated cases on whether AR-15 platform rifles in common use are protected, and the Ninth Circuit reportedly stayed Miller on July 1, 2026, pending that decision. The ban remains fully enforceable.

Court Decisions
Who: All firearms owners in California affected by the assault weapons banReviewed Jul 23, 2026

SB 2 Signed Into Law: California's Post-Bruen Response

Governor Newsom signed SB 2 on September 26, 2023, overhauling California's concealed carry framework in response to the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. The law replaced the struck-down "good cause" requirement with expansive sensitive-places restrictions, new training mandates, and insurance requirements.

Legislation
Who: All CCW permit holders, applicants, and firearms owners in CaliforniaAction: CCW holders must comply with 20 enforceable sensitive place categories. Six remain enjoined: hospitals, transit, worship, financial institutions, permitted gatherings, and private property default.Reviewed Mar 15, 2026

Rupp v. Bonta: Second Assault Weapons Ban Challenge

Rupp v. Bonta is a parallel challenge to California's assault weapons ban filed in the Central District, brought by different plaintiffs but raising similar constitutional issues. The case received a SCOTUS GVR after Bruen and is pending on remand.

Court Decisions
Who: All firearms owners in California affected by the assault weapons banReviewed Jul 23, 2026

Rhode v. Bonta: Ammunition Background Check Challenge

Rhode v. Bonta challenges California's Proposition 63 ammunition background check system, which requires point-of-sale background checks for all ammunition purchases and bans direct-to-consumer online sales. A Ninth Circuit panel struck the system down in July 2025, but the en banc court vacated that opinion and reheard the case on March 25, 2026. A decision is pending, and the background checks remain in effect.

Court Decisions
Who: All ammunition purchasers in CaliforniaReviewed Jul 23, 2026

NYSRPA v. Bruen: Supreme Court Establishes Historical Tradition Test

On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court held 6-3 in NYSRPA v. Bruen that New York's "proper cause" requirement for concealed carry permits violates the Second Amendment. The decision established a new text, history, and tradition framework and eliminated "good cause" requirements for CCW permits nationwide.

Court Decisions
Who: All firearms owners and licensing authorities in the United StatesReviewed Mar 12, 2026